Press "Enter" to skip to content

Month: November 2020

The Law of One—2: overview

Presumptuous even to think one could give an ‘overview’ of something as rich and complex as the teachings of Ra. But we have to start somewhere . . .

If you haven’t already done so, please read The Law of One—1: the story first. It gives important background (with photos) on how the Ra contact came to be and how the teachings were received.

First, a bit of housekeeping:

  1. Ra is not a single being, but a unified planetary group—in their words a “social memory complex”—and so should properly be referred to in the plural (‘Ra are’ . . . ). But this rings strangely to English-speaking ears, so wherever it sounds better I’ll refer to Ra in the singular (‘Ra says’ . . . ). Just bear in mind that any such singular usage should always be understood as referring to a plural entity.

  2. The concept of distortion is met with often in Ra’s teachings, and can mean several things. In this case, know that anything I (or anyone else) says about The Law of One, any description or analysis that you or I might make, is coloured (‘distorted’) by our own perceptions and experience. No getting away from this. Ra also confesses that language is a blunt tool, sometimes incapable of accurately putting across all that is to be said.

  3. Although Ra is an entity more highly evolved and knowledgeable than we, they make no claim to authority, describing themselves simply as “a humble messenger of the Law of One.”

  4. There is an absolute distinction to be made between the actual Law of One and the The Law of One books. The latter are just transcripts of sessions in which Ra speaks about the Law of One. To make this distinction clear, I’ll use italics for the title of the books.

  5. When referencing the The Law of One books, I’ll use the accepted citation method involving two numbers. The first refers to the session number, the second to the number of the question in that session.

All that said, let’s dive in.

About Ra

Ra is (actually ‘are,’ see above) old—really old. A date initially given as 2.6 million years ago is mentioned (89.8)—corrected immediately and almost unbelievably during the same answer to 2.6 billion years ago—as the time when they went through the kind of material (third-density) experience we are currently living here on Earth, in their case on Venus.

They have long since left Venus, and are now at the sixth-density level of evolution (14.19).

Ra’s interaction with mankind started way back before our recorded history, in response to a call from those who wanted to learn about the true nature of the universe.

As part of their mission to teach the Law of One, members of the Ra collective walked the Earth among the Egyptians some 11,000 years ago. They came as brothers and sisters (not gods) but their physical appearance in our density—”tall and somewhat delicate” with a “golden luster” (6.4)—meant they had trouble integrating with the local population, who tended to glorify, even deify them.

Equally, Ra’s teachings were appropriated by the royal elite, who robbed the teachings of their inherent compassion and kept them for themselves.

Because of this the Ra people left Earth, never to walk on it again (1.5).

Ra accepted responsibility for the way in which their teachings had been distorted, and have ever since seen it as their duty—and honour—to try and make reparation.

They admit it was naïve to think their teachings would be shared for the benefit of all, and confess “we cannot plumb the depths of the distortion complexes which infect your peoples.” (3.6)

 About the Law of One

The Law of One is beyond the limitations of language, beyond the limits of our third-density understanding, beyond the specifications of any physics.

As Ra says, “There is no possibility of a complete source of information of the Law of One in this density.” (26.4)

It may only be approximated in language by stating that all things are one.

There is only one being in all the infinite universes. That one being, the Creator, experiences itself in infinite forms, infinite entities, infinite situations—all of equal, sacred value—but remains ever One.

And that you are.

You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One”. (1.7)

Is that it?

This revelation—arresting and philosophically profound though it is—might seem at first glance to offer little of practical value to we humans, as we try to make sense of our dense and chaotic world and just get through the day.

But The Law of One books are a record of many sessions with Ra. During these, Don Elkins grilled Ra on any number of questions, each of which Ra attempted to answer as completely as possible without infringing free will, using the imperfect tool of language.

We’ll cover some of the main themes in a future post, but here are just a few of the myriad subjects on which Ra speaks:

  • disease and healing;
  • karma, releasing of same;
  • universal and galactic cycles;
  • the history of humanity;
  • the coming transition;
  • our purpose in life;
  • the nature of our “reality.”

and more, oh so much more . . .

How you can find out more

There is no substitute for reading the source material.

L/L Research (L/L stands for Love/Light) make digital editions of The Law of One books available for free on their website (here) in pdf, mobi and epub formats.

Much of this material is also available in other languages, accessed via the ‘Translate’ button at the top-right of the site. As of January 2022, languages listed are Chinese, Czech, Dutch, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian.

A series of videos on YouTube introduces many of the features and concepts of the Law of One.

The books are an almost bewilderingly rich resource, discursive in structure, and in language that can sometimes be hard to fathom.

But no need to try and encompass it all—just take whatever resonates for you. It will be the start of your own unique journey with the material and with the teaching.

And to quote from Gary L. Bean’s The Ra Contact: A Concept Guide:

“Ra reminds us that the Law of One abhors no one. It also blinks neither at the light nor the darkness, but is available to any who open the gateway. It works the same whatever your particular personality traits and biographical history, whether you are an intellectual giant or an intuitive feeler, an extrovert or an introvert, whether you came from riches or poverty, or whether you did all the ‘right’ things or all the ‘wrong’ things. No one trait, behavior, or thread of the personal history writes the story. It is the way each aspect of the self is integrated and balanced within the whole in forgiveness and acceptance.”

Salu!

Next: The Law of One—3: some concepts

Comments closed

The Law of One—1: the story

In 1961, a physics professor called Don Elkins with a passionate private interest in the big questions like What is the meaning of life? How big is the universe, and how does it work? What don’t we know? was given a book detailing how a group meditating together might receive information via telepathic contact with extraterrestrial entities.

Much of this chimed with his own researches, so to test the hypothesis he staged a group meditation experiment of his own with some of his students. He didn’t tell them what the purpose of the experiment was.

The results were inconclusive. However, one of the attendees—a girl called Carla Rueckert—seemed particularly receptive.

In 1968, they finally got together, set up a company called L/L Research, and continued their work of research and seeking.

An off-gridder called Jim McCarty had meanwhile heard an interview with the two on radio. Eventually through mutual acquaintances he was introduced, was accepted into the team, and moved in with them in December 1980.

Twenty-three days later, on January 15, 1981, a voice spoke through Carla, now acting as channelling instrument herself, and said “I am Ra.”

Ra identified themselves as a multiple-soul entity from a higher dimension, who had made contact in order to help humanity through a forthcoming transition.

During subsequent sessions Carla would slip into unconsciousness and Ra would operate her vocal chords. So—rather like Edgar Cayce before her—to begin with at least she was quite unaware of what was said during the contact.

Over 106 sessions, Elkins put more than 2,500 questions to Ra, who answered with a truly extra-human calm and patience.

Protocols developed for the sessions included meditation, a protection ritual, massage to alleviate Carla’s arthritic pains after staying motionless for an hour or more during the contact, and meticulously placed objects—sacred text (for Carla, a heartfelt Christian, the Bible), chalice of water, candle, incense—that would both tune the contact and reassure Carla as she left her body.

Ra was careful not to claim any authority, referring to themselves simply as “humble messengers of the Law of One.”

The contacts were all taped and then transcribed by McCarthy. The the result was a series of five books published by L/L Research entitled The Law Of One (The Ra Material).

The contact with Ra continued until the death of Don Elkins in 1984.

Preparing Carla for a session. Placement and alignment of Bible, candle, chalice and incense were important
Carla now ready. Three microphones are linked to three separate tape recorders, to ensure nothing is missed
Don Elkins prepares to ask questions of Ra
Jim McCarthy transcribing

Next: The Law of One—2: overview

Comments closed

The Thick of It

Dysfunctional government is rather in the news these days—whether it’s a U.S. president who hires and fires almost weekly; the same president who won’t concede an (apparently) unquestionable election result; a UK prime minister who even his own party accuses of dithering and incompetence; not to mention all the politicians around the world whose corruption and blatant self-interest are impossible to ignore.

There’ve been plenty of TV series that have portrayed or satirized this—think of West Wing in the States, Yes Minister in the UK, and House of Cards on both sides of the Pond.

But none of these, nor any of the many political movies, have come as close to the bone as Armando Iannucci’s The Thick of It.

Here we have a series that portrays the byzantine machinations of politics brutally and (I’m pretty sure) honestly. As Wikipedia‘s typically po-faced article says, “It highlights the struggles and conflicts between politicians, party spin doctors, advisers, civil servants and the media.”

Hard to know where to start here. Maybe with the stellar performance of Peter Capaldi as director of communications and spin-meister of his party. Or is it the ever-sharp writing, or the wonderful ensemble-playing of the cast . . .

A team of writers produced consistently edgy scripts, and when I tell you that there was a dedicated “swearing consultant” whose task was to add even more colourful language, you’ll get an idea of just how rich the dialogue is.

The series featured no incidental music, no laughter track. All shot hand-held. Plus Capaldi is on record as saying that “Fundamentally 80% of the final cut is the script that we started with.” In other words, some 20% of the dialogue is improvised, which only adds to the sense of realism.

The four series of The Thick of It ran from 2005 to 2012, and never flagged. It was hugely successful, spawning spin-offs on both sides of the Atlantic (the movie In the Loop, a U.S. remake, and the HBO series Veep).

It’s also a series that repays repeated watching, each time discovering new nuances of performance, new appreciation of the quick-fire dialogue and the scabrously inventive invective.

I love it . . .

The Thick of It was at one time on Netflix, also on BBC’s iPlayer, but I’ve also seen it on the UK’s ITVx and various other streaming services. I promise you it’s worth looking out. More about it on Wikipedia.

Comments closed

A sport called . . .

 Ultimate (Wikipedia entry here) is unusual—perhaps unique—in that there are no officials. No referees, no umpires, no touch-judges, nada.

Instead the players officiate themselves, and the sport relies on their honesty and sense of fair play (‘spirit of the game’) to get things done right.

So infringements are called by the players themselves, stuff like fouls (ultimate is in theory a non-contact sport), travels (once you’ve caught a disc you can’t move with it), in- and out-of-bounds calls, picks (not allowed), and a few others.

Inevitably this ethos can be compromised by a ‘win-at-all-costs’ mentality when big prizes are at stake. So teams may opt to have neutral ‘observers’ on the sidelines, as a sort of line judge-cum-dispute resolver.

This is different in the professional game (started in 2012), where there are umpires and line judges.

It’s a very pure running sport: 7-a-side on a field usually somewhere around the size of a football field; endzones not goals; score by catching the disc in the opponents’ endzone; if a disc is intercepted, dropped or goes out-of-bounds, the other team gets possession immediately.

Because a disc thrown right-side-up floats, there’s often enough time for a defender to catch up and bat it away; similarly, there are times when you and the disc are going at the same speed but it’s out of your reach, so the only option is to get off your feet (‘lay it out’) to make the catch.

This makes for some pretty spectacular athleticism, a flavour of which you’ll see in the highlight reel below.

It’s also possible to throw a disc upside-down, when it behaves much more like a ball, with a distinct up-down trajectory. Anyone familiar with American Football will appreciate the skill needed both to make this throw (especially when it’s windy) and to judge the catch or interception (ditto).

The photo at the top of this post (© Toby Green) shows one such. It’s from way back, at a World Club Championships final, but for my money is still one of the great Ultimate photos. What’s happened is that Boston’s Mada has taken off downfield, and the passer has led him with a long upside-down throw that he takes at full sprint in-stride. New York’s John Gewirtz has been distanced slightly on defence, but has seen (or intuited) the throw coming and has laid it out to try for the interception. Alas for him (and to his evident anguish) his right-hand swipe to knock the disc away just hasn’t quite made it. Great play, stunning athleticism (right up there with the best NFL wide receiver vs. cornerback skills), even better photo . . .

The free-flowing nature of the sport means serious aerobic effort—one moment you’ll be running (and thinking) hard to get free, then suddenly there’s a turnover and you’re immediately running just as hard to cover your opponent, themselves now trying to get free to take a pass.

But once you get the disc you’re in effect the quarterback, with a quarterback’s need for clear field vision, calm decision-making and good technique to make the next successful pass.

A very complete sport then . . .

What else? Well, in my day at least, teams would party as hard they played (at some tournaments ‘winning the party’ conferred almost as much cachet as winning the tournament . . . )

Pretty much all big tournaments have an Open Division for both men and women, and these days a Co-ed or Mixed Division too. College or University teams often have their own divisions and tournaments.

And as players have got older, so new divisions have appeared for those still wanting to play but maybe no longer up to Open standards. So there’s Masters (33+ for men, 30+ for women), Grand Masters (40+ and 37+ respectively) and even Great Grand Masters (50+ and 45+).

Most games are played on outdoors on grass, but there are indoor tournaments too, and beach ultimate is also very popular.


I only discovered Ultimate in my early 20s (wish it had been earlier). Played for 15 years or so and retired aged 37 when it became clear that cutting it against the best of the next generation was getting harder.

But during that time I had the privilege of getting to know some of the great teams and great players from around the world, not least the world-dominating New York franchise of the ‘80s and ‘90s.

Damn, we had some fun . . .

But don’t for a moment think this is a game just for the boys. Women’s Ultimate is equally fiercely competitive―supreme athletes from other disciplines, discovering Ultimate, can’t wait to make the switch. Here’s a more recent video from USA Ultimate that gives a taste of the atheticism, sportsmanship and co-ed appeal of this magnificent sport:

More on Ultimate at Wikipedia, USA Ultimate, World Flying Disc Federation

Comments closed

Unacknowledged

[First posted on Facebook 1 May 2020]

Feel the need for a bigger picture view?

If you have Netflix, take a look at Dr Steven Greer’s ‘Unacknowledged.’

Multiple military, corporate and intelligence insider whistleblower testimonies affirm historical and continuing extraterrestrial contact with humanity. They also tell why the secrecy surrounding these contacts has been so ruthlessly enforced.

A picture emerges of the profound existential crisis and choice now facing humanity: on the one hand, endless war, global climate and environmental catastrophe; on the other, disclosure of hitherto-hidden technologies that would instantly create a world of peace, abundance and a sustainable interstellar civilization for thousands of years yet to come.

It’s long past time to open our eyes, open our minds . . .

Unacknowledged also available on Vimeo, SiriusDisclosure, Amazon UK, amazon.com.

Comments closed

Mission

Well I suppose I should start with the book that started me off.

Mid-1970s onwards I had a friend called Ed. We’d met at university, didn’t get on to begin with—like many great friendships—but one Easter break he invited me to his home (my own folks were far away in the Middle East).

It was the beginning of a closeness that was to last until his death. Plus the family were special folks too, in particular his Croatian mother Nada.

Well, one day she slapped a book on the table and said “here, read that, it might interest you . . . “

The book was Patrick Tilley’s Mission, and she wasn’t kidding—it was where my journey began. 40 years on I’m still delving . . .

The plot set-up is simple enough: smart-ass New York lawyer Leo Resnick, late for a date, meets up with his casualty-nurse girlfriend Miriam at the hospital where she works.

She’s down in the morgue, documenting a recent arrival—an unidentified 30-something-year-old male with a strangely familiar pattern of bruises, lesions and wounds.

Leo takes a look, turns away, and turns back to find the erstwhile corpse sitting up and looking at him. Looks away again, and when he looks back the body is gone . . . Only to turn up again a couple of days later at Leo’s upstate cottage.

Leo starts getting down ‘The Man’s’ story. Which takes in the simultaneity of time, humanity’s origins and destiny, the battles above, 1980s New York in the eyes of a man from nearly two thousand years previously, oh, all sorts of stuff.

In the process it makes sense of all sorts of bits of the sometimes puzzling biblical story (like John 8:59 and 10:39,  the lost years, the Resurrection, plenty others).

All sorts of complications meanwhile arise—police, security services, work dilemmas, medical conundrums etc. etc. For as well as all the revelations, it’s a cracking good plotline . . .

Well, I’ve said about all I can without spoiling it for you.

I cannot recommend Mission too highly.

Like many others, I’ve several times bought an extra copy to give to friends.

It’s that good . . .

Patrick Tilley’s Mission at Amazon UK; Amazon.com; Barnes & Noble; Waterstones; Abe Books.

Comments closed

Of their hands: Katzenjammer cobblers

[ Originally posted on Facebook 8 April 2020 ]

I remember long ago coming across a comic-strip which featured two brothers who went by the name of ‘The Katzenjammer Kids.’ Can’t recall much about the substance, but do remember the swept-back crop hairstyles the two kids had.

The Katzenjammer kids

Which is of no consequence at all, except that the hair of the brothers in my next YouTube channel reminded me of them.

Trenton and Heath (the brothers) are cobblers, but about as far removed from your local repairs-while-u-wait as it’s possible to be.

For these two boys are pretty much miracle-workers when it comes to shoes, and this channel explains a little of their trade.

Many of the videos involve taking a pair of apparently ruined shoes and working them back into perfection, with each step filmed and explained.

Not the least of the interest is in how they evaluate the various makes—famous and not so—as they break them down and rebuild them. In the process, you begin to understand why expensive shoes are expensive . . .

Have to say that as a Brit I’m partial to their encomium on the quality and craftsmanship of a pair of John Lobbs.

But it doesn’t really matter where you start, there’s something to be learned for all us lazy trainer-wearers about what proper shoes are all about.

Oh, and this Brit at least can’t get enough of those Nashville accents . . .

Trenton & Heath’s YouTube channel here.

Comments closed

Band of Brothers

[ First posted on Facebook 24 May 2015 ]

Some truths are almost too hard to tell.

Mankind (and I mean man-kind) being as fucked up as it (he) is, the obscenity of war shows no sign of abating.

Until modern times, war has been mostly sanitized and mythologized in film.

In reality it is—has always been—a story of horror, defilement, unendurable loss that must be endured.

Yet a story also of lasting bonds formed, perspective gained, meaning found.

HBO’s Spielberg and Hanks Band of Brothers series manages to put some of this across.

It follows a Company of American paratroopers, taking in their training, their D-Day drops and combat, their involvement in Operation Market Garden and the Battle of the Bulge, their liberation of a Konzentrationslager, their taking of Berchtesgaden and Hitler’s Eagle’s Nest, and on to end of the war in Europe.

Not least among the many moving moments are the voices to camera before each episode of some of those who served and survived.

Impossible to encapsulate the richness of the performances, the gritty faithfulness of the action, the emotion of the whole in just one clip, but here’s a taste from late in the piece—a surrendering German general addresses his troops . . .

If you haven’t already lived this magnificent modern masterpiece, do . . .

Comments closed

Of their hands: Mr Chickadee

[ Originally posted on Facebook 24 August 2017 ]

Occasionally, just occasionally, in among the vapid ‘more-about-me’ online clamour, you come across a true gem.

One such is a YouTube channel called Mr Chickadee.

The premise is pretty simple: Josh and his Peruvian wife Maio have upped sticks and headed out into the Kentucky backwoods, in search of a simpler and more fulfilling life.

Josh sets to, building first a timber-frame workshop and then a two-storey timber-frame cabin.

So far, so ordinary.

Except that he uses only hand-tools. Not a power-tool or chainsaw to be seen or heard.

And therein lies the second marvel: While he goes about the muscle-rending processes of felling, hewing, shaping and joining, Maio films and then tightly edits, occasionally appearing herself where the task involves two.

There’s no talk, none of that tiresome ‘me-me-me’ chatter. Just the sounds of forest nature and the rasp and draw of razor-honed axe, saw and plane, as Josh with quiet assurance goes about his craftsman’s work.

The result is a video series that is therapeutic, entrancing, enriching.

There’s a nice irony in using contemporary media methods to reintroduce age-old skills. Skills we blasé moderns have lost. Yet skills which in the past built houses, villages, towns, even cities.

We can only marvel at the sense of respect, humility and joy that breathes throughout this couple’s shared life and work.

Mr. Chickadee’s work encompasses everything from the hand-hewing of trees into lumber to the smallest, most intricate woodwork.

The video I’ve chosen from the many on his channel is #23 from the “Our timber frame cabin” series: “traditional insulated windows”:

Mr Chickadee YouTube channel here

Comments closed

It’s all out there . . .

[ Originally posted on Facebook 1 March 2019 ]

The world is not as we think it is.

We are not what we think we are.

Those that control us are not those who seem to.

There’s a reason why one-million-plus children disappear every year.

For those who open their minds and dig, the Truth really is out there.

And always has been . . .

Comments closed